Fotojet Free Online Collage Maker - An Update

Late last year, I was invited to review a web service that offered a free online "collage" maker. At the time, I found that for the price, it couldn't be beat, although I also found that there were some basic changes that would go a long way to enhance the product.

Recently, the folks at PearlMountain Technology, who run the service, asked me to take another look at Fotojet. Here's a quick summary of what I've found.

First up, the collage portion of the site is pretty much the same as it was back in mid-December of last year. It still works, and still works well, with the same caveats I noted in that earlier review. In other words, the same shortcomings are still present.

fotojet's new online image editing screen.

What has been added to fotojet is a basic image editing feature. While pretty basic, it's not half bad, and there are some nice effects. On my laptop, it runs smoothly.

The editor is broken down into four functions - edit, effects, text, and clipart - each of which offers a selection of controls.

Edit is a basic image enhancement tool, and offers most of the common tools. The familiar layout allows pretty much anyone who's used any image editor to get a nice result quickly. One thing to watch out for, though, is that you must apply any changes made in one sub-menu before moving to another sub-menu.

In the effects section, you'll find a nice selection of pre-rolled image effects, most of which are a little "over cooked" in my opinion. Each effect offers a single slider to alter the intensity of the effect. Effects can be stacked, but like the Edit functions, you have to apply one effect before moving on to the next. I played around with the sample picture of the girl with the hat, and came up with what I thought was a pleasing result.

fotojet's social media sharing screen didn't render correctly on my computer by default. I had to change the text scaling settings for it to display correctly.

Once you finish with an image, you have the option to save the image to your hard disk, or share on social media. Unfortunately, the sharing option screen doesn't display correctly, at least on my computer.

You'd think that another option for your completed image would be to use it in a collage or design. However, when you switch modules, your image is lost, and I can't see any way to transfer it over, short of saving it to your computer and re-uploading.

While I didn't try using fotojet on an iPad or Android tablet, I can imagine that, if it works at all (it didn't when I reviewed it previously), you'd be hard-pressed to be able to utilize it to its fullest potential.

So, while adding the editing module to fotojet is a nice addition, the integration could be better. Frankly, if I have to edit, download, and re-upload an image to use in a collage, I'm probably going to go ahead a prepare my images in another application, such as On1 Photo Pro. If I'm looking to use an online solution, I'll probably opt for the quite mature and robust Polarr app. While not free, these applications offer far greater control over the final output.

The bottom line is that, while there's some good functionality in the new version of fotojet, the work flow just isn't quite there. And, there haven't been any substantive improvements in the older modules.

Fujifilm's X-T1 and 50-140mm f/2.8 - My Thoughts

I was hired to shoot a very major fundraising event last night, but since switching to Fuji, I had not had occasion to purchase an f/2.8 tele-zoom, and I knew that as versatile as the little XC 50-230mm lens is, it wouldn't be up to the task. I was also concerned that my X-E1 would let me down auto-focusing in poor lighting (I had no such qualms about my X-E2 with version 4 firmware). So, I rented the 50-140 and an X-T1 body for the shoot to work alongside my the X-E2 and the XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4. Unfortunately, I won't be able to share any example images from last night's event, as they're for a client and I don't have a release to do so. I had wanted to shoot a little bit of a local duo performing last Friday night, but I didn't have the energy when I got home from the day gig to go out for the evening.

Fujifilm X-T1 with Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 lens. This is some fancy kit, so I felt it deserved a posh, paisley background.

Anyway .... The box of goodies arrived right on time from the rental house, and I proceeded to unpack the gear. The company sent the body, battery, charger, and "pop-up" flash in a small camera bag, and the lens in a snug-fitting lens pouch, all wedged into the box with foam and air-pouches. When I took the camera bag out of the box, it was so light, I thought at first that they'd forgotten to put anything inside it! In fact, the camera and lens combined weigh less than a Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS! Including the shipping box, camera bag, and pouch, the weight for the X-T1 package is 2.85 lbs. That Canon lens alone weighs in at 3.28 lbs.

Once I was over my initial "scare" that the box was empty, I set the X-T1 up to match, as closely as possible, the control and custom settings I use on my other X-series bodies, after making sure that the latest firmware had been loaded (the rental house I use is very good about this kind of thing, but I always like to be sure).

As usual with my "reviews" of products, this will not be a scientific article with loads of tests and numbers. It will be a very short description of my experience with the gear. Take that for what it's worth.

Fujifilm X-T1

Not a shot of my hands holding an X-T1, but it does illustrate the top-panel layout, and where all the controls fall. Of course, there are buttons and switches on the back and front of the body as well.

Not a shot of my hands holding an X-T1, but it does illustrate the top-panel layout, and where all the controls fall. Of course, there are buttons and switches on the back and front of the body as well.

The X-T1 body really feels good in my hand. As with the rest of the Fuji products I've used, everything pretty much falls under my fingers just the way an old fuddy-duddy like me expects it to. All of the controls operate with solid but smooth clicks or positive button presses. I didn't notice any of the issues others have mentioned with the weather-sealed buttons being hard to press or feeling spongy. The X-T1's electronic viewfinder is astounding. In fact, I'd rate it to be every bit as good as the EVF on the Sony A7-II-series cameras, which many consider to be the best EVFs on the market. With that said, because of my glasses, I still can't see all of the corners of the frame all of the time. The only camera I've tried in the past few years that has a viewfinder I can see all of is the Olympus OM-D E-M5.

I played around a bit with the X-T1 and my XF 18-55mm lens, and it's a fantastic walk-around combination. About the only thing that might be better for a walkabout might be the XF 18-135mm lens, except for 1-stop disadvantage that lens has over the 18-55. Of course, the "darling" combo lens for the X-T1 might be the XF 16-50mm f/2.8. Anyway, X-T1 and 18-55 make a nice, light, easy-handling combo. Of course, so would the X-T10 and the 18-55, for good bit less money.

Image quality from the X-T1 is identical to my X-E2, since the sensor and processor are exactly the same. And, in fact, the images are so good that although I shot raw and JPEG images, I didn't use any of the raw files when editing the pictures from the event.

So, what didn't I like? Typical of all "hump in the middle" DSLR-style bodies, the LCD (which, BTW, is excellent) falls right under my big, greasy, nose, and that means it gets smeary and slimy after shooting for a while. Once I get going and know I'm in the ballpark on a shoot, I don't chimp a lot, but when I do, I don't want to have to clean the LCD to see clearly. With my "rangefinder-style" X-E1 and X-E2 bodies, my nose never touches the back of the camera, so that's never a worry.

For the X-T1, Fuji have moved the SD card slot to the side of the body, and out of the battery compartment. While I like that they moved it, I don't like the cover. It's an odd "slide-and-fold" arrangement, and I'm not sure how sturdy it is. It feels like it might break easily.

I also don't like that there's no "pop-up" flash. Believe it or not, I use the micro-flashes on the X-E1 and X-E2. They don't provide any serious illumination, but they are sufficient to fill in eye-socket shadows and put a catchlight in the eyes if needed. The X-T1 ships with a little flash that slides into the hot shoe. It works just fine, but it's not as convenient as pushing the little flash button on the back when you need that little pop of fill-flash.

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Moving on to the lens, which is officially called the XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR. That's a serious bit of alphabet soup, but then, this a serious lens, people. It's Fuji's answer to using an image-stabilized, weather-sealed, pro-grade 70-200mm f/2.8 lens on a full-frame body. It means business, and it feels like it. It also weighs like it. While, as I mentioned earlier, it's significantly lighter than a comparable lens for a Canon on Nikon, it's still heavy when compared to other Fuji lenses. I think the only heavier Fuji lens is the 100-400mm, which is their lens for serious wildlife photogs (it's apparently also an excellent lens for motorsports).

To say that the 50-140 is a sharp lens is an understatement. It's razor sharp, and focus is generally quite zippy on both the X-T1 and the X-E2. I didn't try it on the X-E1, though I suspect it would fare reasonably well on that camera as well. With that said, it did, on occasion, get lost. In a few cases, it would hunt before locking in, and in a couple of instances, I simply couldn't attain focus automatically. This is where lenses with focusing motors driven by the focus ring can be a both a help and a hindrance. While I could grab the ring and override the auto-focus without having to turn the automation off, the focus ring is not direct drive, and it's electronically "geared" such that it could take a lot of turning to get where I needed it to go. I subsequently missed a couple of shots. With all of that said, I don't think that the problem was any worse than any other system, and in most cases, the Fuji lens/camera combinations performed as well or better than our Canons did with the 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS lenses back when we used them to shoot weddings.

The 50-140 is an image-stabilized lens, and although I didn't perform any scientific tests, I did play a little bit to see how low I could go with the shutter and still get a sharp image. I was impressed, nay amazed, that I could easily hand-hold the 50-140 on the X-T1 down to about 1/30th of a second at 140mm, and when I actually applied myself, I could go down as far as 1/8 second. If you use the standard 1/(focal length * crop factor) formula to determine a safe minimum shutter speed for a lens, that means I should have to shoot at about 1/250. So, being able to shoot easily at 1/30 means I was getting 3-stops with ease, up to about 5 stops of image stabilization.

I started to mention that the 50-140mm is a relatively heavy lens, especially as compared to the body, and on occasion, I felt like the setup was a little nose-heavy, both on the X-T1 and the X-E2. It was never hateful, and it was never at all tiresome. But it sometimes felt just a little off-balance. And, any instability on my part was easily taken care of by the OIS function.

When am I going to buy one?

So, you're all wondering what the bottom line is, aren't you? How soon will it be before I run out and buy an X-T1? Honestly, unless I can find a barely-used one in near-mint condition for $500-600, I feel no particular need to own an X-T1 right now. I still generally prefer the rangefinder-style of the X-E1 and X-E2, and unless they drop that line, that's probably what I'll keep buying. I would, however, definitely rent the X-T1 again if the situation warrants.

The same holds true for the 50-140mm lens. It's not something I regularly need. For the vast majority of what I do, I don't even need the XF 55-200mm lens. The inexpensive XC 50-230mm still works just fine for me most of the time. I could become interested in the XF 100-400, were I to start shooting a lot of wildlife again. But again, for me, rental is my friend unless I find a really crazy good deal.

I should also mention that Donna tried the camera/lens combo for a few minutes and had to put it down. She was particularly impressed with the size and weight of the package, and she already knows about the image quality attainable with the Fuji cameras. She prefers the more DSLR-like styling of the X-T1 over the rangefinderesque X-E or X-Pro models. I think she was fighting urges to leave her Canon behind, at least for a moment (she actually started asking questions like, "how much does this cost?").

So there you have it. My impression of the Fujifilm X-T1 and XF 50-140mm lens. Really nice kit. If I were still shooting weddings, I'd say that Fuji cameras are close enough to ready for prime-time for me to use, with one exception. So, let's talk about that for a moment before I let you go.

Pop goes the flash! Or not.

Last night, I used my trusty, old, Nikon SB-800 flash on the X-T1, and the Fujifilm EF-20 on the X-E2. The SB-800 worked great in combination with the X-T1 and 50-140 lens. Plenty of power, as it always had. And, since it has the ability to work like an old Vivitar 283 "auto" flash, so as long as I was paying attention to what I was doing I could even get good results with automatic flash exposure. Unfortunately, I have to do this because Fuji still has yet to ship a truly professional speedlight. I've held on to the SB-800 for all these years specifically because it's relatively easy to use in almost any situation, with almost any camera.

Fuji have delayed their XF-500 flash (it's now slated for sometime this summer, instead of late this month), which is supposed to finally address the need for a professional flash system for select Fujifilm cameras.

Nissin's i60 flash features high power, TTL/wireless remote, and very simple controls, and works with Fuji's TTL flashes. There's also manual control, when you want it.

In the mean time, Nissin's i60 flash is expected in late June, and the price looks reasonable. If it works as promised, it could offer a better alternative to Fuji's offering, if for no other reason than it will work with other Nissin flashes equipped with their "2.4GHz Air" wireless communications system. Really, working TTL auto flash with an appropriate amount of power is good enough for me, and I'll very likely buy one in the late summer or early fall. I have other gear to use if I'm doing studio-type multi-flash setups.

Of course, the little EF-20 worked perfectly on the X-E2 with the 18-55. Every exposure was spot-on, just like on the X-E1 and on the X10 before that. I was really able to let the camera and flash make their own decisions, freeing me to worry about composition, which is as it should be.

Okay, with that out of the way, you're allowed to go read something else. Cheers!

FotoJet Free Online Collage Maker

Every so often, and especially around holidays, we all need to put together some sort of photo collage, be it for a Facebook post, an e-mail to friends and family, or for some sort of promotional material for our businesses. And, certainly, we can do it in Photoshop or InDesign or Illustrator or even Lightroom - if we have the time. More than likely, though, we need to do it quickly, and most of the "usual suspects" are not conducive to getting the job done right now.

fotojet creative mode templates

fotojet creative mode templates

That's where PearlMountain Technology's Fotojet comes in. Offering hundreds of layouts, some themed, others plain and simple, there's sure to be something there to help you put together a great-looking photo collage, social media cover image, advertisement, or greeting card quickly and easily.

There are two modes of operation: Creative and Classic, though I'd suggest always starting in Creative mode, as there is access to most of the Classic mode templates from within the Creative mode template chooser.

Adding and arranging images, clip-art, and text is fairly straightforward, and there's even an option to import images from your Facebook account. I did find that you can't move objects as a group, nor can you use cursor keys to "nudge" an object. It's also not possible to swap templates on the fly, without losing you're work, making it impossible to "what if?" design choices. I hope that the folks at PearlMountain can find a way to address these shortcomings in the future. But, for the cost, it could be easy to overlook these issues. In fact, at the price, it's really hard to beat fotojet for many quick projects.

The web app is 100% free to use, and works on most browsers running on Windows or Macintosh computers. I was unable to get it to work on my iPhone 6s or iPad Air 2, though PearlMountain have two iOS apps. The iOS apps offer basic functionality for free, and are extendable via in-app purchases.

At present, there's no real indication of how PearlMountain intends to make any money from this endeavor. My contact there indicated that the idea is that fotojet is intended as an introduction to PearlMountain's technology, and that there will be future, paid products coming in the future.

Shooting With The Panasonic Lumix GH4

As promised, a few images and video made with the Panasonic Lumix GH4 and the Panasonic 7-14mm f/4 lens, and some more comments on the camera in use. This is also not and technical review. Lightroom 5.4 can't process the RAW files from the camera, so with the exception of cropping, these are JPEGs straight out of the camera.

As I mentioned previously, the GH4 acts like a pretty typical DSLR-type camera when shooting either stills or video (which I don't like much). There are front and rear command dials in the usual places, and they control the usual things. There are five function buttons that are user-configurable, but I saw no reason to change them from the defaults. Without reading the manual, I was able to use the camera for still photography and get it set up the way I wanted it. There's also a large LCD touch screen on the back that flips out and tilts and swings to pretty much any angle you could want. I was concerned that I'd accidentally send the camera into some unknown mode with my nose when shooting, but the camera switches between the LCD and EVF instantly, and disables the touchscreen just as quickly.

I like the image quality of the JPEGs shot in good light. Colors are vivid, there's good dynamic range, and the pictures are plenty sharp. The autofocus was pretty zippy, too, although shooting with the 7-14mm lens didn't put too much demand on the AF system. Battery life is excellent. I was able to shoot 4K video half the day on Saturday, and shoot a couple more hours on Monday without needing the charge.

Despite being a mirrorless Micro Four Thirds camera, it's as large and as heavy as the Canon EOS Rebel 5Ti. I found that surprising, as part of the appeal of the MFT cameras is that they're supposed to be small and light.

One area of disappointment is the electronic viewfinder. When panning or shooting fast-moving subjects, there's a fair amount of stuttering. I had expected that would be improved in this camera over the GH3, but it's really not a lot better than what I remember of the older camera, which I looked at back in October.

And, now for some HD video. This video is not 4K video. I'll upload some of that in the next few days, once I finish processing it.

This is hand-held, and I have not processed it through the Warp Stabilizer in Premiere. As I've said in the past, I'm not one who believes that still cameras should be regularly used as video cameras. Video cameras are designed specifically for video. However, Panasonic has been promoting the GH-series as "hybrid" cameras, and I'm really, really impressed with the video -- both HD and 4K. With a body price of $1,700, and with the excellent Panasonic and Olympus lenses available, this could be a digital cinematographer's dream camera -- except... that I couldn't find a way to manually control exposure when shooting video. That doesn't mean it's not there, but I couldn't find it.

Panasonic also offer a large adapter that screws to the bottom of the camera that provides professional external connectors for audio and video -- XLR audio inputs, and a number of HD and 4K video output options. Unfortunately, when using the interface option, it is not possible to record video to an SDXC card in the camera -- all recording is to an external device connected to the adapter.

So there you have it. The GH4 is a good, solid, premium camera for those who like the current DSLR paradigm.